Anchors
| Anchor text | Ref. domains ▾ | Top DR | Ref. pages | Links to target | Dofollow links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenJDK | 39 | — | 0 | 101 | 94 93.1% |
| Virtual Threads | 8 | — | 0 | 8 | 8 100% |
| Project Leyden | 7 | — | 0 | 7 | 6 85.7% |
| JDK | 7 | — | 0 | 35 | 35 100% |
| JEP 440: Record Patterns | 5 | — | 0 | 5 | 4 80% |
| JEP 454 | 5 | — | 0 | 5 | 5 100% |
| Java | 5 | — | 0 | 5 | 5 100% |
| https://openjdk.org/ | 5 | — | 0 | 6 | 2 33.3% |
| JEP 483 | 5 | — | 0 | 5 | 5 100% |
| JEP 497 | 5 | — | 0 | 5 | 5 100% |
| JEP 395: Records | 5 | — | 0 | 5 | 3 60% |
| JEP 441: Pattern Matching for switch | 5 | — | 0 | 5 | 3 60% |
| Project Panama | 5 | — | 0 | 5 | 5 100% |
| preview language feature | 5 | — | 0 | 9 | 8 88.9% |
| JEP 461 | 5 | — | 0 | 5 | 5 100% |
| https://openjdk.org/projects/jdk/24/ | 5 | — | 0 | 5 | 3 60% |
| JEP 485 | 5 | — | 0 | 6 | 6 100% |
| JDK 25 | 5 | — | 0 | 9 | 8 88.9% |
| Project Amber | 5 | — | 0 | 5 | 5 100% |
| JEP 467: Markdown Documentation Comments | 4 | — | 0 | 5 | 5 100% |
| JEP 474 | 4 | — | 0 | 14 | 5 35.7% |
| JEP 450 | 4 | — | 0 | 5 | 5 100% |
| JEP 496 | 4 | — | 0 | 4 | 4 100% |
| openjdk | 4 | — | 0 | 155 | 155 100% |
| JEP 456: Unnamed Variables & Patterns | 4 | — | 0 | 4 | 4 100% |
| Sequenced Collections | 4 | — | 0 | 4 | 4 100% |
| Project Valhalla | 4 | — | 0 | 4 | 4 100% |
| JEP 430 | 4 | — | 0 | 9 | 8 88.9% |
| JEP 286 | 4 | — | 0 | 9 | 8 88.9% |
| JEP 491 | 4 | — | 0 | 4 | 4 100% |
| Scoped Values | 4 | — | 0 | 5 | 5 100% |
| JEP 444 | 4 | — | 0 | 6 | 6 100% |
| https://openjdk.org/projects/jdk/21/ | 4 | — | 0 | 4 | 2 50% |
| JEP 455 | 4 | — | 0 | 10 | 10 100% |
| https://openjdk.org/projects/jdk/25/ | 4 | — | 0 | 4 | 2 50% |
| Structured Concurrency (Second Preview) | 4 | — | 0 | 7 | 7 100% |
| Compact Object Headers | 4 | — | 0 | 4 | 4 100% |
| JEP 261 | 4 | — | 0 | 4 | 3 75% |
| Generational ZGC | 4 | — | 0 | 4 | 4 100% |
| JEP 484 | 4 | — | 0 | 4 | 4 100% |
| Project Loom | 4 | — | 0 | 4 | 4 100% |
| JEP 445: Unnamed Classes and Instance Main Methods (Preview) | 4 | — | 0 | 4 | 4 100% |
| JShell | 4 | — | 0 | 4 | 2 50% |
| JEP 467 | 4 | — | 0 | 6 | 6 100% |
| Scoped Values (Second Preview) | 4 | — | 0 | 6 | 6 100% |
| JEP 395 | 4 | — | 0 | 9 | 9 100% |
| JEP 477: Implicitly Declared Classes and Instance Main Methods (Third Preview) | 3 | — | 0 | 4 | 4 100% |
| JEP 471 | 3 | — | 0 | 5 | 5 100% |
| JEP 424 | 3 | — | 0 | 4 | 4 100% |
| JEP 469 | 3 | — | 0 | 5 | 5 100% |
Frequently Asked Questions
What anchor texts are used to link to openjdk.org?
This page shows all anchor texts found in backlinks pointing to openjdk.org, sorted by the number of referring domains using each anchor. Anchor texts range from branded terms (like the domain name itself) to keyword-rich phrases that describe the linked content. The distribution of anchor texts reveals how other websites perceive and describe openjdk.org.
What is anchor text?
Anchor text is the visible, clickable text in a hyperlink. Search engines use anchor text as a signal to understand what the linked page is about. For example, if many sites link to a page using the anchor text "best running shoes," search engines infer that the page is relevant to that topic. Anchor text appears in several forms: exact-match (contains target keywords), branded (uses the company or domain name), generic (like "click here"), and naked URLs.
Why is anchor text analysis important for SEO?
Anchor text analysis helps identify potential SEO risks and opportunities. A natural backlink profile has diverse anchor texts including branded terms, generic phrases, and topic-relevant keywords. Over-optimization, where too many backlinks use the same exact-match keyword anchor, can trigger search engine penalties. Conversely, understanding which anchors drive the most authority (measured by referring domain count and DR) helps prioritize link building efforts.
How many unique anchor texts does openjdk.org have?
The anchor text report for openjdk.org displays all distinct anchor texts grouped by their hash. Each row shows how many unique referring domains use that anchor, the total number of links, and the dofollow percentage. A high number of unique anchors generally indicates a healthy, natural backlink profile with diverse link sources.