Anchors
| Anchor text | Ref. domains ▾ | Top DR | Ref. pages | Links to target | Dofollow links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| made it clear | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| building a roadmap around it | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Matryoshka Dolls | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| left me cold | 1 | — | 0 | 4 | 4 100% |
| Sajax is still unsafe | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Sam Ruby: Rails Confidence Builder | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 0 0% |
| calling for implementations | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Anatomy of a Well Formed Log Entry | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 0 0% |
| Open Source Web 2.0Dave Johnson: Web 2.0 is not about having cool software to install on your own personal web server, it’s about getting locked into services provided by and trusting your data to Web sites that you do not control. It doesn’t have to be that way, of course, and perhaps I’m exaggerating a bit just for fun (and hits). | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Submitted for Your Approval | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| original test feed | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| And now for something completely different | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| JVM futures | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Sam Ruby: Distributed State Machines | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 0 0% |
| Sunsetting Quirks Mode | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Sam Ruby: Book Trends | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 0 0% |
| RSS 2.0 contro Atom 1.0 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 0 0% |
| soap based blogging API | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Follow up on Nofollow | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 0 0% |
| launched by Sam Ruby | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Sam Ruby: WOA vs ROA | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| weblog standards | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| discussion | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Shameless Pandering | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 0 0% |
| http://intertwingly.net/blog/2004/04/25/utf-8-musings#c1082919794 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 0 0% |
| MSDN 1.0Mihai Parparita: Blogs hosted on MSDN seem to have started to generate Atom 1.0 recently. However, perhaps due to a misreading of the Atom 1.0 spec, each entry contains a link node with the relation set to “self” when pointing to the HTML version of it (instead of "alternate"). Google Groups did this for a while too when it switched to Atom 1.0, so it seems to be a common error with developers that are just starting out with Atom generation. It would be nice if the validator could flag t | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| blog | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Sam Ruby linkittäessään Bloglinesin sivuun | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Sam Ruby's | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Capacity Planning for Multi-Tenant SQLite Applications | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Sam Ruby’s daughter discovers Ruby on Rael | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| reported | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Two html lines | 1 | — | 0 | 2 | 2 100% |
| Venus/WordPress Integration | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| hacking | 1 | — | 0 | 2 | 2 100% |
| Sam Ruby: It Just Works | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 0 0% |
| Seybold: RSS versions | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Improved Namespace Support | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Sam managed to get out of 110 odd lines of python | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| RSS feed | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| http://intertwingly.net/tmp/81cd494abd36509f0d46010b0c4d4ff9 | 1 | — | 0 | 2 | 0 0% |
| sam ruby | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Email addresses your OpenID via DNS | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| saw | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| clarifying what a “log entry” is | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Here's where you can find a link to the Python code | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
| Sam Ruby: Sincerest Form Of Flattery | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 0 0% |
| intertwingly.net | 1 | — | 0 | 2 | 2 100% |
| the complexity of HTTP encodings in 125 slides | 1 | — | 0 | 2 | 2 100% |
| Rocket ScienceLuke Hutteman: I mean, it’s not like this stuff is exactly rocket science, is it? | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 100% |
Frequently Asked Questions
What anchor texts are used to link to intertwingly.net?
This page shows all anchor texts found in backlinks pointing to intertwingly.net, sorted by the number of referring domains using each anchor. Anchor texts range from branded terms (like the domain name itself) to keyword-rich phrases that describe the linked content. The distribution of anchor texts reveals how other websites perceive and describe intertwingly.net.
What is anchor text?
Anchor text is the visible, clickable text in a hyperlink. Search engines use anchor text as a signal to understand what the linked page is about. For example, if many sites link to a page using the anchor text "best running shoes," search engines infer that the page is relevant to that topic. Anchor text appears in several forms: exact-match (contains target keywords), branded (uses the company or domain name), generic (like "click here"), and naked URLs.
Why is anchor text analysis important for SEO?
Anchor text analysis helps identify potential SEO risks and opportunities. A natural backlink profile has diverse anchor texts including branded terms, generic phrases, and topic-relevant keywords. Over-optimization, where too many backlinks use the same exact-match keyword anchor, can trigger search engine penalties. Conversely, understanding which anchors drive the most authority (measured by referring domain count and DR) helps prioritize link building efforts.
How many unique anchor texts does intertwingly.net have?
The anchor text report for intertwingly.net displays all distinct anchor texts grouped by their hash. Each row shows how many unique referring domains use that anchor, the total number of links, and the dofollow percentage. A high number of unique anchors generally indicates a healthy, natural backlink profile with diverse link sources.